The exciting news from Haryana, Punjab, is associated with an Indian lawyer and Prince Harry. The woman Palwinder Kaur was so serious about the issue that she went to the Punjab and Haryana High court to sue prince harry.
Although the news is yet to go viral on the internet as the court has deemed the petition to be baseless and nothing more than a misunderstanding. How did this misunderstanding begin, and what happened to the women in the end? Let’s get all the answers related to the Kaur VS Prince Harry case here below,
What did the woman plead to the court?
The woman reported that she was engaged to Prince Harry on social media and the royal blood of Britain promised her to marry. It is as it sounds.
When Prince Harry got married to Meghan Markle in 2018, Kaur (the woman) informed that Harry desired to marry her before marrying Meghan.
Not only that, Kaur wanted to take legal action against Prince Harry and so she went to court to plead her case file. Does she have any evidence? Or is it completely a joke?
Is there any evidence?
As evidence, Kaur showed some printout copy which defines that she had a conversation with an ID named Prince Harry. Kaur pleaded the case without any lawyer on her side as she is a lawyer herself.
By showing the conversation copy, Kaur accused Prince Harry of making false promises and was looking for immediate action to make her dream come true.
But unfortunately, the court was working on transcripts of conversations and found them to be nonsensical, full of grammatical errors, and the pronunciation was nothing like British English.
Did she ever travel to Britain?
Kaur also said that she had even massaged Prince Charles, father of Prince Harry, to have a look at this issue and cooperate with this wedding. The court asked her if she had previously traveled to Britain and the answer was also negative.
What’s the court’s verdict in this regard?
After hearing the complaint, the court came to the conclusion that Palwinder was a victim of online catfishing, which has become a common scenario on social media platforms nowadays.
Simply put, catfishing involves using a fake identity on social media to connect with people and convince them to carry out bad intentions. Catfishers develop fake identities using individuals’ images, dates of birth, geographical location, and general information. Catfisher works with a specific goal and they use bad tricks and treachery to achieve that.
However, Kaur’s incident is one example of online catfishing. The court examined the printouts and declared that the conversation was associated with a fake person. And the judge said a court could not rely on the so-called chats printouts.
“I find that this petition is nothing, but just a daydreamer’s fantasy about marrying Prince Harry. This petition, though very poorly drafted, both grammatically and lacking the knowledge of pleadings, speaks about some emails between the petitioner and Prince Harry, in which the person, sending the email, has stated that he promises to marry soon,” ruled by Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan.
So, the court declared the case null and void.
Finally,
Social media has both positive and negative aspects. People with evil intentions can use social media as an advantage to succeed in their goals. Since it is so easy to create profiles with fake identities, there are hundreds and thousands of people who become victims every day all over the world.
There are many different reasons behind catfishing. Catfishers can be anyone of any age and can lead to many cyber crimes, such as identity theft, money scams, financial fraud, intellectual property infringement, and so on. However, in the above case, Palwinder Kaur was lucky that she took the court’s help for a solution. Otherwise, she might have had to lose money or something expensive in the end.
